Love the idea. It's really painful to cycle through every theme. Would be great to have a way to scroll through them directly, though... that would result in a bigger bundle, and I respect the hustle
We have different definitions of lightweight it seems like.
steezeburger 53 minutes ago [-]
Brb, gotta go cough up some mucss
robertclaus 3 hours ago [-]
I like marx
jrapdx3 2 hours ago [-]
Interesting. Having made websites I think "of course that makes sense!". As a practical matter, getting wanted page appearance can require adding a few classes. I've been guilty of class proliferation caused by perfectionistic tweaking of things to the last nanogram. Anymore I strive not to go there.
What does resetting inconsistent browser behavior have to do with classless styling? Those two aren't the same.
1 hours ago [-]
maxk42 3 hours ago [-]
I love classless CSS for rapid hand prototyping. LLMs are making this increasingly less necessary, but it's still great for creating tiny, performant CSS pages and some of the smaller ones can even be inlined in fewer bytes than it takes to make a 2nd round trip to the server to check if the asset has been updated. This is one of my secret weapons for creating web apps that load and render so fast you can feel the difference!
e12e 4 hours ago [-]
[2019]
But might be due a revival on the shoulders of LLMs.
https://dohliam.github.io/dropin-minimal-css/
We have different definitions of lightweight it seems like.
But might be due a revival on the shoulders of LLMs.